[PATCH] ls: clean up memory leak
Michael S. Zick
mszick at morethan.org
Wed May 3 13:14:14 UTC 2006
On Wed May 3 2006 05:45, Vladimir N. Oleynik wrote:
> Glenn L. McGrath wrote:
>
> >>My licensed is more free as GPL, but if not like my works, you do not use.
> >>I do not see conflict it with GPL.
> >>As result: good patch for the "ls" applet you reject as your the bad maintain
> >>political but not license a problem.
>
> > Can you post your license please, or if its a standard license, which
> > one ?
>
> Only my source: may safely be consumed by a BSD or GPL license.
>
Just add the above and I think everything will be all right.
> As second author: previous license.
> For patchs: no a license. If it have a hard work, then added (c) line only
> with comment the work.
>
> But it has no sense. I do not wish to change the license for my work,
> but why you compel me it to make?
>
They only ask that you _add_ a license. You own your work, you may license
it as many ways as you wish. The "May be used under BSD or GPL license."
is just one more license.
I often have to do this with my own work, two licenses;
The one I like and the one a project needs.
Mike
> If you wish to spit frankly on the author actively participating in common
> development, why you continue to use my work? Remove all my work and we shall
> finish with it for ever. I can support it itself.
>
> I already am afraid to express in this mailist as the maintainer will make
> with the offered idea on the further development exactly on the contrary ;-)
>
>
> --w
> vodz
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
>
More information about the busybox
mailing list