[PATCH] hdparm size reduction
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Mon May 1 19:19:52 UTC 2006
On Saturday 29 April 2006 3:14 pm, Tito wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch applies on top of the last applied patches of Denis
> and removes some dead code in identify(),
> some obsolete code in process_dev() and some obsolete functions
> (no_scsi(), no_xt(), no_scsi_no_xt()) as in latest hdparm6.6.
>
> Please apply.
The first two hunks were rejected.
What's the deal with chksum? In the previous code, it was never being set (it
was only set in the dead code that was never reached), and now it's tested in
one place where they only care that' it's zero. There's another place that
we print it and say it's correct, but we never actually _test_ it so how do
we know...?
> Ciao,
> Tito
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list