Question about mount
rob at landley.net
Wed Mar 29 17:37:24 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 11:14 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:49:38AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> >On Wednesday 29 March 2006 2:04 am, Alexander Griesser wrote:
> >P.S. Is it just me, or are we having serious number trouble with these
> >releases? 1.00, 1.01, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 126.96.36.199... I mean, I know ones and
> >zeroes are great and all, but we've _got_ to stick a 2 in there
> > eventually...
> As said here (http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-March/019846.html),
> please let's not do 188.8.131.52, but bump the patchlevel: 1.1.x
> In june, for the upcoming next minor stable release, we'd then have
> 1.2.x and so on, ok?
Sounds reasonable. How long should fixes accumulate first, though?
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox