is there a naming convention for libbb files/routines?
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Tue Mar 28 22:10:21 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 11:31 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Monday 27 March 2006 11:35 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > in some cases, the function name will *not* exactly match the
> > > source file name -- witness the source file "mtab.c" which defines
> > > only the function erase_mtab(). so why not "erase_mtab.c"? no
> > > big deal, though. onward.
> >
> > I believe that one used to define more, but I trimmed it. Didn't
> > rename it because my attempts to do so count as a delete and a
> > create, and thus blank the svn history for the file. Dunno why.
>
> i'm pretty sure that shouldn't happen. you did "svn rename"
> explicitly and subversion tossed the history? that sounds like an
> obvious bug.
>
> rday
Yup. I've been treating it as a "don't" do that then" for the moment, and
vaguely planning to try again either with the next Ubuntu release or when I
dig up FWL and get some time to beat on that.
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list