[PATCH] unify fdflush and freeramdisk 2

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at mindspring.com
Tue Mar 14 19:01:27 UTC 2006


On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Bernhard Fischer wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:42:13PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:04:06PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> >On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Rob Landley wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 2:20 am, Tito wrote:
> >> >> > On Tuesday 14 March 2006 03:41, you wrote:
>
> >> >> > BTW: maybe the extern slipped through removed 8 gazillion occurrences of
> >> >> > "extern" on function definitions patch ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Quite possibly.
> >> >
> >> >i was the one sho submitted that "extern" cleanup/removal patch.  what
> >> >possible glitch are we talking about here?
> >>
> >> Possibly one of these:
> >> find ./ -name "*.c" -exec grep -Hirn "extern " {} \;
> >
> >i'm not sure how any of that relates to the patch i submitted as
> >that patch did nothing but *remove* extraneous storage class
> >specifiers on function definitions.
>
> I didn't follow the discussion, but it sounds like the opposite is
> the case: you remove too _few_, i.e. there still are some left as
> indicated above.

ah, that's entirely possible as i just wrote a short perl script to do
all the heavy lifting and i was ultimately concerned with not breaking
anything, so i was prepared to accept not getting every example if
they had some funny syntactic pattern.

i'll take another pass and see what i missed.

rday

p.s.  removing too *few* should not have broken anything.



More information about the busybox mailing list