unable to boot Linux smoothly while there is physical address 0xc0000000.
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Tue Mar 7 15:45:22 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 2:18 am, stanliao at globalunichip.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Our system has physical address from 0x3c000000 ~ 0x3effffff and from
> 0xc0000000~0xc0100000.
From that sentence alone, there is no _possible_ way the rest of this message
could be a BusyBox issue.
> We put linux kernel on 0x3c008000
Those are the people to talk to.
> and the compressed ramdisk at 0x3c800000,
> the system
> runs without problems. While the 0xc0000000~0xc0100000 is enabled, problem
> raised.
You're writing your own bootloader?
> By my
> understanding, the virtual address of our linux kernel occupy 0xc0000000
> ~0xffffffff (from the System.map
> and the vector table address).
Only the kernel should ever know the difference between virtual and physical
addresses.
> Excuse me, would the physical address 0xc0000000~0xc0100000 impact the
> linux kernel (suppose that
> the system has no error in hardware design)?
Why don't you ask the linux-kernel guys?
> Best Regards,
> Stan Liao
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list