revision 14426 can't be built

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Mon Mar 6 22:37:08 UTC 2006


On Monday 06 March 2006 9:28 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:35:37AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> >On Thursday 02 March 2006 21:48, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:22:15PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> >> >On Thursday 02 March 2006 9:33 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:03:32PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> >> >> >In the fresh tree:
> >> >> >
> >> >> ># make allnoconfig
> >> >> >/.share/usr/src2/bbox/busybox.tst/e2fsprogs/Makefile.in:72: FIXME:
> >> >> > change .c to include their stuff relative to
> >> >> > /.share/usr/src2/bbox/busybox.tst/e2fsprogs make: *** virtual
> >> >> > memory exhausted.  Stop.
> >> >
> >> >It blew up so hard chunks wound up embedded in the wall.  Makefile:248
> >> >complains about every single Makefile.in in the entire tree not being
> >> > found, and then it dies.
>
> make-3.79.1 doesn't have a MAKEFILE_LIST. Workaround installed.
>
> NOTE: building out of tree with make-3.79.1 is *not* supported.

Entirely acceptable.

> for building out-of-tree, users of make-3.79 still have to pass
> top_srcdir= to make:
> make -f /srcs/busybox/Makefile top_srcdir=/srcs/busybox

I'm happy with "building out of tree isn't supported in anything before 
make-3.80".  That's the easiest way to document it in the README.

> >> >I notice that line 248 is more residue of the "modules" approach, which
> >> > I asked to be separated out, and was told had been separated out.  Did
> >> > I misunderstand?
> >>
> >> No, I goofed backing out all of it, which is clearly not was intended.
> >>
> >> vda, Rob, can you please svn up and let me know if it is ok now resp.
> >> where it freaks out now? Thanks and sorry for any inconvenience this may
> >> have caused.
> >
> >Revision 14453 still does not work:
>
> Revision 14455 does work for me with make-3.79.1 from redhat when
> building in the source-tree.
>
> Can somebody please confirm this?

I'm working on the stripped down version of a Red Hat 9 image for you.  (Whole 
lotta "rpm -e" goin on...)

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.



More information about the busybox mailing list