"LIBBB-m"?
Bernhard Fischer
rep.nop at aon.at
Thu Mar 2 18:28:56 UTC 2006
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:02:51PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Thursday 02 March 2006 7:30 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>No, it won't.
>
>Remember what I said about ripping that out? How I do not like that approach,
>how I'm not convinced that is a good approach, how I polled my co-workers
>here at timesys to see if it was just me and _they_ didn't like that approach
>either?
>
>Sneaking infrastructure for that into the three when I explicity asked that it
>be separated out and we worry about it later is not the way to convince me
>that it's a good approach. Really, it isn't.
Removed all 5 occurances of "-m" which were unused and shouldn't have
been there in the first place.
More information about the busybox
mailing list