"LIBBB-m"?

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 02 March 2006 7:30 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:53:00AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >  in the most recent update to libbb/Makefile.in:
> >
> >...
> >
> >-LIBBB-y:=$(patsubst %,$(srcdir)/%,$(LIBBB-y))
> >+LIBBB-y:=$(patsubst %,$(srcdir)/%,$(LIBBB-y) $(LIBBB-m))
> >                                              ^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >where did "LIBBB-m" suddenly come from?
>
> from config MODULES for standalone, which will be dealt with
> after 1.1.1 is released.

No, it won't.

Remember what I said about ripping that out?  How I do not like that approach, 
how I'm not convinced that is a good approach, how I polled my co-workers 
here at timesys to see if it was just me and _they_ didn't like that approach 
either?

Sneaking infrastructure for that into the three when I explicity asked that it 
be separated out and we worry about it later is not the way to convince me 
that it's a good approach.  Really, it isn't.

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.