a few short observations on latest BB
rep.nop at aon.at
Wed Mar 1 19:42:46 UTC 2006
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:32:43PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Jason Schoon wrote:
>> Isn't there a known issue that our dependencies require a "make clean"
>> whenever switching between configuration to insure the binary rebuilds in
>> the intended manner, or is that fixed?
>i explicitiy did a "make distclean" in between builds to make sure i
>didn't have any build contamination issues between each test.
>i'm not trying to make a big deal out of this, i just wanted to
>understand the effect of choosing to build a "Feature complete" shared
>library and i just don't see how this works.
>if someone wants to provide a sample session of builds that
>demonstrates what is supposed to happen, i'd be happy with that.
>until then, i guess i'll just go off and RTFS for now.
Could be that i only added this for the IMA case, i'll have a look..
Thanks for pointing this out.
More information about the busybox