thoughts on reorganizing BB menuconfig structure?
rob at landley.net
Sat Mar 25 02:21:55 UTC 2006
On Friday 24 March 2006 4:34 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 14:39, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > the biggest problem, i think, is the arbitrary grouping of so many
> > > entries under "Coreutils", "Linux System Utilities" and "Miscellaneous
> > > Utilities." some thoughts (some large, some small):
> > the groupings arent arbitrary, they correspond to the actual
> > upstream packages
> ok, i see. now it becomes clearer.
I noted in the readme that we replace bzip2, coreutils, e2fsprogs, file,
findutils, gawk, grep, inetutils, less, modutils, net-tools, procps, sed,
shadow, sysklogd, sysvinit, tar, util-linux, and vim. (I note that this list
should have gzip and patch added to it.)
We don't have directories for all of those packages.
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox