Disabling inlining entirely saves 400+ bytes...

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Tue Jun 20 22:42:42 UTC 2006


On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:00, Rob Landley wrote:
> If the code really _needs_ to be inline, then expand it inline by hand.

talk about a bad idea

wonder how always_inline gcc attributes play with -finline-limit=0
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20060620/f662ef7b/attachment-0002.pgp 


More information about the busybox mailing list