[patch] abuse of strncpy

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 06 June 2006 17:31, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 02 June 2006 9:05 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, walter harms wrote:
> > > lets call it bb_strlcpy(), so there is less confusion.
> > > re,
> > >  wh
> >
> > i have a better idea -- let's not.  in fact, let's do away with this
> > whole notion of arbitrarily prefixing modified library routines with
> > that thoroughly useless "bb_" prefix.
>
> I'm not a fan of the bb_prefix.  It's a recent addition, and it was
> originally there solely due to name collisions.  I see no downside to
> removing it.

that'll put us back to having naming space issues then ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20060607/d69544e5/attachment-0002.pgp