strangeness involving e2fsprogs header files

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Wed Jul 5 15:24:36 UTC 2006


On Wednesday 05 July 2006 12:32 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > A) Either the standard #include files should work, or we shouldn't be
> > using those names.
>
> the standard includes might work if they're from the same version, but we
> cant really rely on that

All we should need are the on-disk structures.

> > B) The point of #include "" instead of #include <> is that it searches
> > local directories first.  This was in C89 let alone C99.  Are you saying
> > the build for this directory is so screwed up that doesn't work reliably?
>
> do you really need me to copy and past the e-mails ive already sent ?

No, I just need to yank this code.

> -mike

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.



More information about the busybox mailing list