[PATCH] LDFLAGS configuration
Bernhard Fischer
rep.nop at aon.at
Tue Jul 4 08:27:54 UTC 2006
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:45:32PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Friday 30 June 2006 6:19 pm, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>> On 6/9/06, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 08 June 2006 6:22 pm, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>> > > On 6/8/06, Shaun Jackman <sjackman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > I agree. I'd also like to see CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX renamed to
>> > > > CROSS_COMPILE, as Linux names it. It makes sense to do it at the same
>> > > > time it's remove from .config.
>> > >
>> > > I just noticed that although the config option was named
>> > > CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX, the make variable was named CROSS. So, do the
>> > > maintainers prefer to keep the make variable named CROSS, or switch to
>> > > the Linux name, CROSS_COMPILE? I can see benefits to both, but we
>> > > should pick one definitively.
>> >
>> > Go with CROSS_COMPILE. You only have to build three things for a minimal
>> > embedded system: the Linux Kernel, uClibc, and BusyBox. It would be nice
>> > if they all worked roughly the same way...
>>
>> As discussed above. Please apply.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Shaun
>>
>> 2006-06-30 Shaun Jackman <sjackman at gmail.com>
>>
>> * (CROSS) Rename to CROSS_COMPILE and move its configuration to
>> .config.mak.
>
>This patch doesn't seem current.
It is current and applied cleanly.
done.
More information about the busybox
mailing list