[PATCH] LDFLAGS configuration

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Sat Jul 1 17:45:32 UTC 2006


On Friday 30 June 2006 6:19 pm, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 June 2006 6:22 pm, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > > On 6/8/06, Shaun Jackman <sjackman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I agree. I'd also like to see CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX renamed to
> > > > CROSS_COMPILE, as Linux names it. It makes sense to do it at the same
> > > > time it's remove from .config.
> > >
> > > I just noticed that although the config option was named
> > > CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX, the make variable was named CROSS. So, do the
> > > maintainers prefer to keep the make variable named CROSS, or switch to
> > > the Linux name, CROSS_COMPILE? I can see benefits to both, but we
> > > should pick one definitively.
> >
> > Go with CROSS_COMPILE.  You only have to build three things for a minimal
> > embedded system: the Linux Kernel, uClibc, and BusyBox.  It would be nice
> > if they all worked roughly the same way...
>
> As discussed above. Please apply.
>
> Cheers,
> Shaun
>
> 2006-06-30  Shaun Jackman  <sjackman at gmail.com>
>
> 	* (CROSS) Rename to CROSS_COMPILE and move its configuration to
> 	.config.mak.

This patch doesn't seem current.

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.



More information about the busybox mailing list