tmpfs size option not working

[Jason Schoon]

I'm in the same boat.  I've investigate the -tiny, it seems very cool,
but I haven't had time to actually apply it.  Last I tried, I had
enough other patches already in place that it didn't even come close
to applying cleanly.  Figuring out which individual patches I want to
apply and/or fix just wasn't a viable option at the time.



On 1/6/06, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> On Thursday 05 January 2006 13:47, Jason Schoon wrote:
> > Yes, it's all horribly confusing, and I bumped into all of this right about
> > the same time as Rob.  I liked the size savings I could realize on my
> > embedded platform by using the ramfs underneath, but I needed the size
> > restriction feature enough that I switched back to tmpfs.
>
> Are you using Matt Mackall's -tiny tree?  I vaguely remember that he had some
> kind of stripped down tmpfs option I haven't had time to look at...
>
> Rob
> --
> Steve Ballmer: Innovation!  Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word.
> I do not think it means what you think it means.
>