tmpfs size option not working

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 05 January 2006 13:47, Jason Schoon wrote:
> Yes, it's all horribly confusing, and I bumped into all of this right about
> the same time as Rob.  I liked the size savings I could realize on my
> embedded platform by using the ramfs underneath, but I needed the size
> restriction feature enough that I switched back to tmpfs.

Are you using Matt Mackall's -tiny tree?  I vaguely remember that he had some 
kind of stripped down tmpfs option I haven't had time to look at...

Rob
-- 
Steve Ballmer: Innovation!  Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.