Is sed delete command broke?

[Rob Landley]

On Tuesday 03 January 2006 15:31, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Chey wrote:
> > Sorry, I didn't mean to upset you.
>
> Don't worry. Some of us get upset for nothing ;-)

I'm upset because I fought with the pathologically mis-designed bug list again 
(and it broke on me again, of course), and eventually after fighting with it 
found out there are two new bugs but one of them is NOT A BUG, it's a feature 
request that's been described on the list already, was in my personal todo 
list (and an open window on my desktop, and a tagged message in my email 
client), and would belong in the TODO list in svn if it wasn't currently 
under discussion.  But no, they put it in the bug generator.  And thus I have 
lost all interest in seeing it merged into 1.1.0.

And I am annoyed.  But that's normal when dealing with the bug generator.  
Maybe I'll have recovered interest after my plane flight tomorrow.  (I know 
that whoever put the entry into the bug generator wasn't thinking "ha, if 
he's interested in clearing the bug list before shipping he now has to take 
this feature to close this bug!" but I still have an enormous knee-jerk 
"screw it, this is not going into 1.1.0 if I have to _revert_ it" reaction 
that I'm trying to fight off right now.)

Rob
-- 
Steve Ballmer: Innovation!  Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.