[PATCH] fdisk.c: major whitespace/style cleanup
Jason Schoon
floydpink at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 20:27:16 UTC 2006
Vodz,
Thank you for posting the original post. I'm not disputing the value
of the change to Config.in, as that is exactly the configuration that
I am currently using. A busybox without large files support, but an
fdisk that supports large disks.
The part I am questioning is the fdisk-specific code in the Makefile.
It attempts to switch on some defines, that are never subsequently
used in the code.
Here is my original post from this month with patch. I think this and
my TFTP patch got lost in the shuffle.
http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-February/018208.html
On 2/25/06, Vladimir N. Oleynik <dzo at simtreas.ru> wrote:
> Jason Schoon wrote:
>
> > BTW: look at the fdisk-specific and from what I can tell completely
> > unnecessary rule in the Makefile if you want to get rid of it sooner.
>
> http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox-cvs/2003-August/004369.html
>
>
> --w
> vodz
>
More information about the busybox
mailing list