[PATCH] fdisk.c: major whitespace/style cleanup

Jason Schoon floydpink at gmail.com
Sat Feb 25 20:27:16 UTC 2006


Vodz,

Thank you for posting the original post.  I'm not disputing the value
of the change to Config.in, as that is exactly the configuration that
I am currently using.  A busybox without large files support, but an
fdisk that supports large disks.

The part I am questioning is the fdisk-specific code in the Makefile. 
It attempts to switch on some defines, that are never subsequently
used in the code.

Here is my original post from this month with patch.  I think this and
my TFTP patch got lost in the shuffle.

http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-February/018208.html



On 2/25/06, Vladimir N. Oleynik <dzo at simtreas.ru> wrote:
> Jason Schoon wrote:
>
> > BTW: look at the fdisk-specific and from what I can tell completely
> > unnecessary rule in the Makefile if you want to get rid of it sooner.
>
> http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox-cvs/2003-August/004369.html
>
>
> --w
> vodz
>



More information about the busybox mailing list