busybox as dynamic lib

[Rob Landley]

On Monday 20 February 2006 11:31 pm, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > Is there any time schedule for this feature?
> >
> > On my Embedded SELinux journey I just learned that I need certain
> > binaries stand-alone in order to apply the policy correctly (e.g. init
> > or the modutils). Splitting up an existing .config and running make +
> > further scripting stuff on those fragments sounds like some work, and I
> > don't like to start this right now when there are alternatives in sight.
> > Maybe I could even invest some of the gained time in a generic solution
> > for busybox...
> >
> > Jan
>
> That was my concern when I was building an selinux box.
>
> Now im building a distro where i am refactoring everything with extreme
> prejudice. And busybox seem to be an easier approach than trying to chop up
> coreutils etc.

Alright, I'll queue it up for 1.1.2 first thing.

But lemme get 1.1.1 out first.  (Adding /dev/root support to mdev -s right 
now...)

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.