miscutils/nmeter.c:19: warning: redefinition of `ulong'
Yuwen Dai
yuwend at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 01:57:33 UTC 2006
On 12/4/06, walter harms <wharms at bfs.de> wrote:
>
> ulong != int64_t
>
> far better would be a s/ulong/unsigned long/g
>
trivia: ulong is a BSDism so far i know
yeah, I had a wrong concept.
The point is: how to build buzybox with a older verson of glibc and
headers. The busybox developer seem use a higher verrsion of glibc, didn't
notice this issue.
Yuwen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20061205/ef4c136e/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the busybox
mailing list