BusyBox, uClinux, telnetd and shared memory

[Ian Oliver]

In article <VA.00001d04.090f273b at foxhill.co.uk>, Ian Oliver wrote:
> am I best minimising 
> memory usage by building a separate BB executable that contains only 
> the telnetd applet?

BTW, my question is prompted by the fact that the system I am working 
on already seems to be building multiple BB executables. I'm guessing 
that the cat executable being the same as the busybox executable (no 
soft link) is just madness.

But telnetd is built from BB (based on looking at internal strings) but 
is much smaller suggesting a BB config just to build this application.

Thanks

Ian