[PATCH] hdparm 6.6 1/2
Tito
farmatito at tiscali.it
Sat Apr 29 12:45:13 UTC 2006
On Friday 28 April 2006 21:11, you wrote:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 7:40 am, Tito wrote:
> > Ok, fine.
> > Should we at least port the kernel headers stuff to the current svn.
> > If you agree I will rediff patch 04.
> >
> > hdparm66_kernelhdrs_04.patch for miscutils/hdparm.c
> >
> > to remove
> >
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/hdreg.h>
> > #include <linux/major.h>
> > #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> >
> > from hdparm.c
> >
> > Let me know your opinion about it.
>
> I'm neutral on it. Doing copy and paste from headers doesn't make it any less
> linux-specific. It's unlikely to make it work on any system it didn't
> already work on before. To me the bigger issue is some way to mark the thing
> "linux-specific" so the config can switch that off if people want to build
> for macosx or libgloss or so on.
>
> It already won't work on any environment where those headers are unlikely to
> be there, would we prefer that it didn't work at build time or it didn't work
> at runtime?
I just did it because i thought it was busybox's policy to never include
kernel headers.
In this particular case it is a good thing because it helps to reduce size.
Ciao,
Tito
> Rob
More information about the busybox
mailing list