alternative decodeString() for httpd.c
Vladimir N. Oleynik
dzo at simtreas.ru
Mon Apr 17 09:54:07 UTC 2006
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i have no idea what this means. in an earlier post, i described what
> i thought was some odd behaviour based on the current implementation
> of decodeString() in httpd.c. specifically,
>
> $ httpd -d "abc"
> abc OK
> $ httpd -d "abc/"
> abc/ also OK
> $ httpd -d "abc%2f"
> bc%2f ??????
>
> why did the leading "a" disappear? and why was that trailing "/" not
> decoded? perhaps this is what it's *supposed* to do but it just looks
> strange to me. feel free to explain what's happening here if you
> know.
It is a small problem in API decodeString() <->httpd_main().
As it is solved you already saw in the new version.
And at all how you have offered, by removal of *specially added* code.
> the proposal to remove the STANDALONE feature in httpd.c was discussed
> for *days* on this list. it would have been nice if you'd said
> something before now.
days? Lie!
http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-April/020413.html
http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-April/020423.html
its 2 hour. In my local timezone is 23.51 and 00.47 clock.
I sleep in this time.
--w
vodz
More information about the busybox
mailing list