busybox.h vs libbb.h

[Mike Frysinger]

On Sunday 02 April 2006 17:39, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:19:56PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >On Sunday 02 April 2006 17:12, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> >> Mike, is there a specific reason why you would want to merge busybox.h
> >> and libbb.h apart from just sloppily including busybox.h anywhere
> >> instead of knowing what one needs where?
> >
> >i never said anything about merging them ... i wanted to know when should
> > we
>
> ah, i must have misunderstood then and mixed you and landley, sorry.

i'm not saying i'm against merging them (would make things much more sane imo 
if everything just included busybox.h), just that i didnt propose the idea

> >be using busybox.h and when should we be using libbb.h ... when i hack on
> > the code from time to time, i sometimes see one, sometimes the other, and
> > sometimes both, and it's kind of confusing :P
>
> Use libbb.h when in you touch any lib-dir: {*/,}lib*
> Applets have to include busybox.h

sounds good
-mike