busybox.h vs libbb.h

[Rob Landley]

On Friday 31 March 2006 8:11 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 31 March 2006 19:25, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Friday 31 March 2006 5:58 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Friday 31 March 2006 17:40, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > > > I want to move the buffer allocation schemes from busybox.h to
> > > > libbb.h.
> > >
> > > did we ever reach a consensus as to what should be using busybox.h /
> > > libbb.h ?
> >
> > The original idea was that applets should include busybox.h, and library
> > code in libbb should include libbb.h.
>
> you say "original" ... that implies that current behavior does not and
> maybe should not match this ...
> -mike

No, just that it may have drifted a bit over time.  For example, his proposed 
checkin is switching several libbb files from busybox.h to libbb.h, which 
goes back towards the original idea.

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.