[PATCH] mke2fs size reduction
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Fri Sep 23 09:09:00 UTC 2005
On Thu Sep 22, 2005 at 08:57:52PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2005 15:23, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > here (in test_disk() ) is an alleged candidate for
> > {,UN}RESERVE_CONFIG_BUFFER(buf,1024)
> > [snip]
>
> I'm a little ambivalent about extending use of RESERVE_CONFIG_BUFFER before we
> nail down a couple issues.
>
> What platforms is using a lot of stack space on bad? (And how much is bad?)
> Busybox has developed a number of dependencies on the Linux kernel, and I
> don't know of any Linux systems where the stack doesn't grow dynamically.
> (What, mmu-less variants?)
uClinux (mmu-less) has a fixed sized stack.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the busybox
mailing list