Problems with insmod & modprobe

[Peter S. Mazinger]

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Scott Kirkpatrick wrote:

> It doesn't appear to be that problem.  All the modules are listed with 
> full paths in modules.dep.  The weird thing is that the binary of 
> busybox that is working is v1.00-pre8 that we build on 10/8/2004 and 
> rebuilding it causes modprobe/insmod to not work.  The problem is that 
> we don't know what gcc or uclibc version was used to build it, although 
> it should be the same that we are using now.

maybe kernel-header version dependency ?

Peter
> 
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> Egor Duda wrote:
> 
> >Scott Kirkpatrick wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>It's a 2.6 kernel.  That's my next step in debugging it.  I couldn't
> >>find anything in the archives and didn't know if this was a known issue.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Could it be possibly this one?
> >http://www.busybox.net/lists/busybox/2004-October/012936.html
> >
> >It only affects modprobe, but not insmod, though.
> >
> >egor
> >  
> >
> 
> 

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net>           ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2