Focus on 1.1 or 1.0.2?

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Sat Sep 3 02:10:35 UTC 2005


On Friday 02 September 2005 10:07 pm, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 09:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 02 September 2005 10:12 am, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 September 2005 23:33, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 01 September 2005 08:14 pm, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > > Anyway, I'm checking them into the 1.1 tree, but either they'll
> > > > > need to be marshalled into the 1.0 tree and a 1.0.2 released, or we
> > > > > should put out 1.1 in the next month or two.
> > > >
> > > > i think we should go for a 1.0.2 ...
> > > > -mike
> > >
> > > So work on stabilizing and shipping 1.1 should happen when, exactly?
> >
> > when we feel 1.0 has been sufficiently stabilized and/or limits of
> > development have been reached
> >
> > as long as we keep a limit on feature additions in 1.0, stabilizing
> > should hopefully be a somewhat trivial task
>
> Translation: there's really no point in these new features actually being
> already written, is there?  They're going to languish for another year or
> two, for no readily apparent reason.

not really, no reason we cant do both

cut a 1.1_pre1 tarball and move stable fixes to 1.0.2 ... nothing wrong with 
keeping a stable tree while we try to get the development tree up to snuff
-mike



More information about the busybox mailing list