[patch] bug #7 -- which(1) is b0rked
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Thu Sep 1 23:29:21 UTC 2005
On Thursday 01 September 2005 11:01, Paul Fox wrote:
> are you suggesting that we change all of the busybox shell code
> to not handle this case? like it or not, this behavior with
> respect to PATH has existed forever. it's part of execvp(), for
> instance.
I was under the impression we didn't handle it now...
> like tabs in makefiles, some syntax decisions were made far too
> long ago to be changed now.
Actually, I believe modern "make" commands all accept spaces. Any
indentation works. (And people complain about python... :)
Rob
More information about the busybox
mailing list