Inetd.c sigpause() --> __xpg_sigpause() not in uClibc

Vladimir N. Oleynik dzo at simtreas.ru
Wed Nov 9 09:00:54 UTC 2005


Rob,

> Actually, I'm hoping vodz will pipe up and explain why we shouldn't just 
> revert the whole darn thing.  What is the advantage of the new version?  What 
> was wrong with the old one?  (This doesn't look like a cleanup to me...)
> 
> Again, it's not my area, but it looks kinda ugly.  (I could poke Erik to take 
> a look at it and give a judgement call, but I want to hear from vodz 
> first...)

I do not understand, what you so are indignant?
The previous version was very old and had set of problems.
Actually I have made synchronization owing to occurrence of two messages
to busybox`s bugreport.
Yes, I did not test assembly under uclibc.


--w
vodz



More information about the busybox mailing list