Inetd.c sigpause() --> __xpg_sigpause() not in uClibc
Vladimir N. Oleynik
dzo at simtreas.ru
Wed Nov 9 09:00:54 UTC 2005
Rob,
> Actually, I'm hoping vodz will pipe up and explain why we shouldn't just
> revert the whole darn thing. What is the advantage of the new version? What
> was wrong with the old one? (This doesn't look like a cleanup to me...)
>
> Again, it's not my area, but it looks kinda ugly. (I could poke Erik to take
> a look at it and give a judgement call, but I want to hear from vodz
> first...)
I do not understand, what you so are indignant?
The previous version was very old and had set of problems.
Actually I have made synchronization owing to occurrence of two messages
to busybox`s bugreport.
Yes, I did not test assembly under uclibc.
--w
vodz
More information about the busybox
mailing list