[BusyBox] udhcpc transaction id and chaddr checking

[Jason Schoon]

It's been a while since I looked at the DHCP RFC(s). If this behavior was 
consistent with the RFC's, and it doesn't meet with resistence from the 
udhcp maintainers, I would vote for no config option as well.

On 5/25/05, Keith Smith <keith at galaway.com> wrote:
> 
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Friday 20 May 2005 06:14 am, Tobias Krawutschke wrote:
> >
> >>I ran into a problem that a board sometimes took a IP Address not
> >>assigned to it and so having two boards with the same IP Address. A
> >>solution was mentioned in the README.udhcpc, section: note on udhcpc's
> >>random seed.
> >
> >
> > Has this patch been dealt with yet?
> >
> > Rob
> 
> Nope. It would be great if somebody could critique it.
> 
> I can't see why a standard DHCP client would ever be interested in
> packets targeted to another client, so I don't think it's necessary to
> make this feature optional as suggested in Tobias' patch.
> 
> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at mail.busybox.net 
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20050525/a85c141f/attachment-0001.htm