[BusyBox] Problems with ash

Steven Scholz steven.scholz at imc-berlin.de
Wed May 18 14:59:56 UTC 2005


olivier.delouya at takimaging.com wrote:

>  > that said, i wouldnt mind adding {,} expansion to ash (if i had any 
> clue how
>  > that is)
> 
> whoops..
> 
> I would not recommend that
> ash-bbox should stay compatible bit to bit with ash, including its 
> restrictions.
> else script portability assurance will become a nightmare..

Ok. But then should another BB shell support this?

~ # head /etc/pcmcia/wireless
#!/bin/sh

So the wireless script would work with a different shell as well as long as 
/bin/sh points to it.

--
Steven



More information about the busybox mailing list