[BusyBox] Problems with ash
Steven Scholz
steven.scholz at imc-berlin.de
Wed May 18 14:59:56 UTC 2005
olivier.delouya at takimaging.com wrote:
> > that said, i wouldnt mind adding {,} expansion to ash (if i had any
> clue how
> > that is)
>
> whoops..
>
> I would not recommend that
> ash-bbox should stay compatible bit to bit with ash, including its
> restrictions.
> else script portability assurance will become a nightmare..
Ok. But then should another BB shell support this?
~ # head /etc/pcmcia/wireless
#!/bin/sh
So the wireless script would work with a different shell as well as long as
/bin/sh points to it.
--
Steven
More information about the busybox
mailing list