[BusyBox] lpd?

[Nico Schottelius]

Dear Walter,

walter harms [Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:33:35PM +0200]:
> why should i want a 'non-queuing lpd' ?

You would need it, if extra queueing is not needed as in scenarios
we have here: We have dozens of thin-clients, which have an lpd
running, which is only there for their own documents.

As Windows (ICA client in this case) queues the jobs itself, we do not
need to requeue it.

Sincerly,

Nico

-- 
Keep it simple & stupid, use what's available.
Please use pgp encryption: 8D0E 27A4 is my id.
http://nico.schotteli.us | http://linux.schottelius.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20050621/e31161b9/attachment-0002.pgp