[BusyBox] [PATCH] fix compilation of libbb/mtab_file.c

[Rob Landley]

On Friday 22 July 2005 21:21, Arthur Othieno wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:49:34PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Friday 22 July 2005 18:21, Arthur Othieno wrote:
> > > Hey, revision 10556 removed CONFIG_FEATURE_MTAB_FILENAME without _no_
> > > mention of it. The log in question reads:
> > >
> > >   Rodney Radford submitted ipcs and ipcrm (system V IPC stuff).  They
> > > could use some more work to shrink them down.
> > >
> > > Re-defining it was only out of the impression that it was removed
> > > by accident.
> >
> > As I mentioned in my next post: yeah, it was.  This is part of my mount
> > rewrite that leaked in by accident when I marshalled a patch through my
> > development tree.  (The mount side is more or less finished, but the
> > umount side still has a couple tangles I haven't managed to get to yet.)
>
> Ok, just saw it now. Seems there's a (noticeable) lag between when messages
> are replied to to when they are eventually posted to the list...

Gee, I wonder why:

------------

The original message was received at Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:13:44 -0400
from grelber.thyrsus.com [192.168.1.31]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<rep.nop at aon.at>
    (reason: 553 sorry, mail from your location [66.92.53.140] is 
administratively denied (#5.7.1))

-------------

Incidentally, since most spam has had forged "from" addresses for around three 
years now, bounce messages like that one are a noticeable portion of the spam 
problem...

> > Sounds good.  I'll add it to my queue...
> >
> > Rob
>
> FYI, also posted to bug #0000322 here:
> http://busybox.net/bugs/view.php?id=322

Ah, in that case I'll wait for Paul to get it...

I'm trying to put together an -rc2 tonight.  Doesn't mean I _will_, but I'm 
trying...

>  Arthur

Rob