[BusyBox] CONFIG_ name clashing with kernel

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Tue Aug 2 02:48:23 UTC 2005


On Mon Aug 01, 2005 at 10:09:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2005 06:55 pm, Paul Fox wrote:
> >  > >> we can rename these three defines (SYSCTL/TR/WATCHDOG) or we could
> >  > >> take care of this now (and forever) by replacing all of the macros
> >  > >> with a different namespace:
> >  > >
> >  > > BB_CONFIG_*> Let's not make the prefix longer, thanks.
> >  >
> >  > I agree entirely. I like the BB_ prefix though. How about
> >  > BB_FEATURE_xxx instead? (i.e. s/CONFIG_/BB_/)
> >
> > this would be a _big_ change.  i know this has been hashed
> > through, but is it really really necessary?
> 
> i really think it is

But not for busybox 1.01...

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the busybox mailing list