[BusyBox] Re: ash bug
Jean Wolter
jean.wolter at inf.tu-dresden.de
Thu Jul 31 14:16:10 UTC 2003
"Vladimir N. Oleynik" <dzo at simtreas.ru> writes:
[ forwarded reply from Herbert Xu ]
> ash's behaviour is correct. POSIX imposes no restrictions on this.
> Even with the patch, you will still see no output if you did
:(
Am I really wrong and the behaviour of ash is correct?
I simply can't believe that but I don't have any arguments if Herbert
says, Posix doesn't specify that so I'am free to implement it like I
want without bothering whether this makes sense or not.
Is it actually correct to mix the stderr output of the shell and a
command the shell is executing?
Thanks for looking at it Vladimir,
Jean, disabling ash in his current busybox configuration
More information about the busybox
mailing list