[BusyBox] Re: wacky busybox/msh (from uClinux-dist-20020701) SIGWINCH failure?
Miles Bader
miles at lsi.nec.co.jp
Tue Jan 28 09:22:14 UTC 2003
Erik Andersen <andersen at codepoet.org> writes:
> Is it possible that sigaction for your architecture is not
> properly handing sa_restorer? I recently found such a problem in
> uClibc for both arm and x86... The symptoms you describe are
> consistant with that type of a problem...
Not sure, but at least that's a direction to investigate. I wouldn't
be surprised if there are signal handling bugs lurking on the v850.
I'm not entirely sure what sa_restorer does; the man page says:
The sa_restorer element is obsolete and should not be used. POSIX does
not specify a sa_restorer element.
Will it have an effect even though cmdedit.c is simply using `signal()',
(not sigaction)?
Thanks,
-Miles
--
`Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'
More information about the busybox
mailing list