[BusyBox] init applet "reverse order" config file?
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Mon Sep 30 15:01:03 UTC 2002
On Thu Sep 26, 2002 at 03:12:33PM -0400, Allan Clark wrote:
> BusyBox;
>
> I didn't see any discussion of this inthe last month's subject lines.
> There is seems to be no way to search the archives.
>
> (Busybox 0.60.4, linux-2.4.19, full-blown libc and ld-linux)
> >From the documentation:
> (http://www.busybox.net/downloads/BusyBox.html)
> > Unrecognized actions (like initdefault) will cause init to emit an
> > error message, and then go along with its business. All actions are
> > run in the reverse order from how they appear in /etc/inittab.
> >
> > <process>:
This used to be true. But people found it confusing so I changed
it, but I forgot to update the docs. I just updated the docs in
CVS.
> What order is the correct (ie intended) way?
The docs now read:
"All actions are run in the order they appear in /etc/inittab"
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the busybox
mailing list