[BusyBox] lash - alternative symlink
bhoc at pentagroup.ch
bhoc at pentagroup.ch
Wed May 16 01:04:24 UTC 2001
Larry wrote:
> Is hush getting close to your needs? What ash features
> are most urgently missing? I hope it's not functions,
> aliases, or case/esac, those get pretty complicated.
Yes indeed I use ash for things like case...esac and the like, ie to
tackle my init scripts.
For the operator to hack/play/test around I prefer lash, mainly because of
command history etc
which ash doesn't offer.
> For the moment, just hack
> APPLET(sh, shell_main, _BB_DIR_BIN)
> to
> APPLET(lash, shell_main, _BB_DIR_BIN)
> in applets.h. I'm not sure it's worth adding this
> as a configuration option.
I'll try the APPLET( hack. I had a peek at it but feared it might break
other things.
With Kind Regards
Benedikt Hochstrasser
(tictactux at surfeu in ch)
More information about the busybox
mailing list