[BusyBox] makefile differences from current CVS and 0.50

Mark Whitley markw at lineo.com
Fri Mar 23 21:14:00 UTC 2001


On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:31:14PM -0600, Manuel Novoa III wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Mark Whitley wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:32:27AM -0700, Dr. Craig Hollabaugh wrote:
> > > No I didn't do an install because I didn't have to with the 0.50 release (it
> > > just worked).
> > 
> > Weird. Even pre-0.50 I always had to do a 'make install' on uClibc to get
> > busybox to link against it. *shrug*
> 
> Actually, the "make install" for uClibc is unecessary if you are staticly
> linking against uClibc.  That's because the gcc wrapper currently always looks
> for the static library in the uClibc build directory.

Oh ho, that clears things up. I was dynamically linking.

Mark Whitley
markw at lineo.com





More information about the busybox mailing list