[BusyBox] makefile differences from current CVS and 0.50

Mark Whitley markw at lineo.com
Fri Mar 23 18:29:55 UTC 2001


On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:32:27AM -0700, Dr. Craig Hollabaugh wrote:
> At 10:26 AM 3/23/2001 -0700, Mark Whitley wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 05:48:28PM -0700, Dr. Craig Hollabaugh wrote:
> >> Today I got the current source via CVS (makefile version still says 0.50
> >> although its different), uncommenting the uClibc line, gives me this
> >> linker error
> >> 
> >> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -luClibc collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >> 
> >> I'm not looking for a solution (using the non-cvs version is fine) but
> >> just to point out that the makefile has some issues.
> >
> >Did you build uClibc and do a 'make install'? That will put libuClibc.so.X
> >in /lib so ld knows were to find it. If it's not installed, ld will give
> >you the "cannot find -luClibc" error.
> 
> 
> Mark,
> 
> No I didn't do an install because I didn't have to with the 0.50 release (it
> just worked).

Weird. Even pre-0.50 I always had to do a 'make install' on uClibc to get
busybox to link against it. *shrug*

> I'll check out the install script and see what gets installed. 

Okey-doke. If you find a problem, do let us know about it.


Mark Whitley
markw at lineo.com





More information about the busybox mailing list