[BusyBox] makefile differences from current CVS and 0.50

[Dr. Craig Hollabaugh]

At 10:26 AM 3/23/2001 -0700, Mark Whitley wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 05:48:28PM -0700, Dr. Craig Hollabaugh wrote:
>> Today I got the current source via CVS (makefile version still says 0.50
>> although its different), uncommenting the uClibc line, gives me this linker
>> error
>> 
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -luClibc
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> 
>> I'm not looking for a solution (using the non-cvs version is fine) but just
>> to point out that the makefile has some issues.
>
>Did you build uClibc and do a 'make install'? That will put libuClibc.so.X in
>/lib so ld knows were to find it. If it's not installed, ld will give you the
>"cannot find -luClibc" error.


Mark,

No I didn't do an install because I didn't have to with the 0.50 release (it just worked). I'll check out the install script and see what gets installed. 

Thanks for the info!
Craig