[BusyBox] another hush fix

[Tom Cameron]

Erik,
	You may want to leave it in there for those people that need only a
_BASIC_LEVEL_ shell, and have tighter space constraints.

--
Thomas Cameron
Network Technician / Operations Specialist
St. Mary's Bank
"First in the Nation, Second to none"

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Erik Andersen [SMTP:andersen at lineo.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 12:53 PM
> To:	Larry Doolittle
> Cc:	busybox at busybox.net
> Subject:	Re: [BusyBox] another hush fix
> 
> On Wed Jun 06, 2001 at 04:51:45PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> > Fixes the interaction between if/then/else/fi syntax and variables.
> > I planned to do it right from the beginning, but my implementation
> > was buggy.  Also adds the relevant test cases.  Also adds some old
> > Matt Kraai variable test cases that got left out somehow.
> 
> thx.  applied.
> 
> > Is it time to close bugs #1038 and #1039 with the message "use hush
> > instead"?
> 
> Yes, I think so.  I have already made hush the default shell.  
> hush is now 26k, vs 19k for lash.  I am tempted to remove lash 
> all together.  There is nothing that lash does that hush does 
> not do better at this point.
> 
>  -Erik
> 
> --
> Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersen at lineo.com
> --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox