[BusyBox] again: busybox is slow !!
Vladimir N. Oleynik
dzo at simtreas.ru
Fri Jul 13 10:00:07 UTC 2001
Johannes Zellner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as I got no response to may mail a few days ago:
> It takes about (at least) two seconds for the prompt
> to get back (for all of the shells hush, msh, ash).
>
> OTOH executing multiple commands (in a script) is
> reasonable fast. Also a command like
>
> ls; ls; ls; ls; ls;
>
> is reasonable fast: it takes about two seconds before
> the first ls starts, then the consecutive ls's are
> done immediately, after the last ls it takes again
> some two seconds for the prompt to come back.
>
> This is really annoying!
>
> (I linked busybox dynamically against libc).
> Any help much appreciated!
I as could have tried to test a turning out code ash+cmdedit, including by very
weak
machine: 486sx25 without coprocessor with libc5 and glibc2 and kernel 2.2.19 and
2.0.39...
I guess, that I should make to receive a numerous mention of it subject.
--w
vodz
More information about the busybox
mailing list