[BusyBox] Improving Our Development Process _after_ 0.49
Erik Andersen
andersen at lineo.com
Wed Jan 24 18:52:54 UTC 2001
On Wed Jan 24, 2001 at 10:05:46AM -0800, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> > How so? Ignoring it altogether or flock'ing the module being
> > inserted?
>
> One or the other, I don't care. It's not as if the flock()
> call will take that many bytes (insmod is already a monster).
> But all the insmod usage (including modprobe) I know of is
> "single-threaded", so locking shouldn't be needed.
Ok then, by executive fiat, I hereby declare 'insmod -L'
a no op. I'll fix that up now.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen email: andersen at lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the busybox
mailing list