[BusyBox] Improving Our Development Process
Vladimir N. Oleynik
dzo at simtreas.ru
Wed Jan 24 16:42:32 UTC 2001
Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:39:18AM -0500, Gennady Feldman wrote:
>
> I think this proposal is a much better idea than splitting the
> source across several repositories. I'd like to make the follow
> suggestions:
>
> 1) There should be two output options -- one which generates two
> binaries (one suid and the other not) for the paranoid (at the
> price of duplicated common code), and another which drops
> permissions for non-suid processes.
>
> 2) One Config.h file in the root directory which specifies all
> the applets, rather than splitting them across directories.
>
> 3) The functions of utility.c should be split into separate files
> in a libbusybox subdirectory to get rid of the #ifdef X || Y
> nastiness that is currently there (and often broken).
WOW!
It would be the best decision. Thank. The sky has heard my prays :)
I only can not understand, why you do not consider my idea with
micro-suid-wrappers and at will one/many binaries.
--w
vodz
More information about the busybox
mailing list