[BusyBox] u_int_32 vs u32

Aaron Lehmann aaronl at vitelus.com
Tue Aug 28 16:26:20 UTC 2001


On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:30:24PM +0000, Laurence Anderson wrote:
> A few applets (fsck_minix, fbset, mkfs_minix and rpm2cpio) have their own
> definitions of u32 etc, which isn't very portable (they are defined in
> terms of a 32 bit arch). Shouldn't they be using u_int32_t & co?

IMHO





More information about the busybox mailing list