[BusyBox] Re: http download for busybox

Chip Rosenthal chip at laserlink.net
Wed Sep 6 00:22:08 UTC 2000


On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:25:20AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> One thing to note is that this implementation does not support
> HTTP/1.1 "chunked" transfer-coding.

Yes.  It wouldn't be hugely difficult ... but the value/code ratio
seems small.  Chunked transfers are of greatest value for dynamic
web content.  I think what most people would need -- or at least
what I needed -- was the ability to download static files.

But, as you noted, it is a nonconformance.  I'm willing to review it
if it causes some real problem.

-- 
Chip Rosenthal * chip at laserlink.net * http://users.laserlink.net/~chip/
Covad Communications * Internet Services Design Lab * Austin, TX





More information about the busybox mailing list